Memory is a funny thing. I know this happened but I’m not sure exactly when and the details are hazy. Our local cinema used to have late-night screenings on a Friday night. Not the latest releases, but what you might call cult classics, in the days before they were available on video. We are talking about the mid to late seventies here.
One Friday after the pub we trooped along to see a Nicolas Roeg double bill, attracted by the prospect of David Bowie in The Man Who Fell to Earth. That was on first, so it must have been well after midnight when the second film started. I had heard of Don’t Look Now, but I didn’t know much about it, except that it was adapted from a story by Daphne du Maurier, known to me as the author of Rebecca.
I have never seen any other film that generates such a sense of unease and dread. Even something seemingly innocuous, the interview at the police station, is full of. . . well, what exactly? The same feeling that runs through the whole story, that there is something you can’t quite grasp, out of reach, until everything that seemed fragmentary is connected horrifically and tragically at the end.
They used to turn the heating off, so imagine watching those scenes of a dank and wintry Venice in a cold cinema. Then think of the ending and imagine walking home in the early hours of the morning after that. I would never forget this chilling story of bereavement and second sight.
I have seen it several times since on the television, and I have read Daphne du Maurier’s story more than once. It’s fascinating to compare the story and the film. It’s only fifty pages or so, a longish short story, but too short to be called a novella.
The prologue in England was added for the film, but what Roeg also did was to take the story and make it more visual, as you would expect, by creating the repeated images of the colour red, water and breaking glass. The colour red was something of a theme with Roeg in his earlier films as director of photography, such as Fahrenheit 451 and Far From The Madding Crowd.
Something that could not really be transferred to the screen was the fact that the viewpoint character is the man. Thus we have a female writer looking critically at a woman through the eyes of a man. Also, the film was set roughly contemporary to when it was made, in 1973. In the story, there are indications that it is set a bit further back, in the nineteen-fifties, say. The fame of the film has rather overshadowed the story, but I feel that although they are distinct works in their own right, it should always be remembered that the original ideas that drive the film came from the fertile imagination of Daphne du Maurier.
Du Maurier was a favourite writer of my parents. My mother was particularly fond of the novel The King’s General. There was always a bit of a problem with Du Maurier’s reputation in that, for all her fame and success, she was regarded as a writer of “romance” or “women’s fiction”. That probably put me off reading her work when I was younger. Don’t Look Now and the other short stories place her in quite different territory, much closer to Patricia Highsmith or Shirley Jackson who were her true peers, rather than Georgette Heyer, say.
Around the time of the centenary of du Maurier’s birth, in 2005, I saw a stage production that was an adaptation of the story, rather than the film. I think the stage design of this was done by people who had worked in the opera. It looked like real water seeping down the dark walls. At the interval we walked up to the front, to get an idea of how it was done, and found it was indeed real and there was a gutter at the lip of the stage. The play had also taken the story back to its original time.
I know I shall read the story and watch the film again, but I feel that neither are to be taken lightly. Both are masterpieces but not exactly uplifting. One has to be in the right mood. I was lucky to see the film with no prior knowledge of it, so I could react to the film itself, and not any preconceived idea of it.
I later met someone who said that they didn’t like the film, which surprised me. But then they had been obliged to watch it as part of a film studies course, a different thing entirely. Nothing kills your appreciation of a film like being told in advance it is a classic.
The Good Reader 