The Secret Trilogy by John Gardner

John Gardner is mainly remembered today for his series of James Bond continuation novels, published between 1981 and 1996, but he wrote many other espionage stories. The Railton family saga is a trilogy of long novels. They are The Secret Generations (1985), The Secret Houses (1988) and The Secret Families (1989). The family trade of the British Railtons and the American Farthings, to whom they are linked by marriage, is intelligence work.

On the back of the first volume there is a quote from Len Deighton, who says that this is the first book to combine a family saga with the history of British intelligence. This is interesting, because Deighton’s Berlin Game had been published in 1983, and was the first volume in his long sequence of novels involving Bernard Samson, which covers fairly similar territory. Who had the idea first? It may well be that Gardner was influenced not so much by Deighton as by Douglas Reeman. Badge of Glory by Reeman was published in 1982 and was the first in his sequence of Blackwood family novels, a family who all served in the Royal Marines. Gardner himself was an ex-marine.

The first volume makes more of the historical angle than the later ones do. Starting before the first world war, we see the origins of what became MI5, MI6 and GCHQ. The complex plot involves German spies in England and Ireland, as well as British spies in Germany, during the naval arms race of this time. In his London house, Giles Railton, the patriarch, has a den, from which he oversees the operations of his espionage network. There is a cabinet containing his huge collection of model soldiers from all eras, with which he replays the great battles of history. His son Caspar is badly wounded in the war. By the end we have learnt that not all the Railtons are loyal to Britain. Giles is revealed to have become a convert to communism, out of guilt at the advantages of the class he was born into. A postscript set in 1935 reveals that his son Ramillies, who went missing in Germany in the war, has become a Russian KGB officer.

The second volume moves forward in time and is set in the late 1940s and early 1950s. It is largely concerned with a retrospective investigation into the betrayal and rounding-up of a French resistance group during the second world war. This has some resemblance to the Klaus Barbie affair, although he is not mentioned by name. Caspar’s role in all this now comes into question. His nephew Donald Railton, known as Naldo, becomes a leading character. There is a lot of action on the streets of  early cold war Berlin, convincingly rendered.

We get the “origin story” of Herbie Kruger, who had already featured in another series of books by Gardner. Here, he is a streetwise young Berliner and keen student of English who is recruited by British intelligence. He is devoted to the works of Gustav Mahler. He is a significant character in the third book, too, by which time he has risen through the ranks and is based in London. We suspect that his colourful, not quite correct use of English might be a deliberate ruse to wind up his superiors.

The third volume, which starts in 1964, is perhaps the best. Caspar is now dead, but his connection to the Russian double agent known as “Alex” is under investigation, so once more Naldo must find out if his uncle was a traitor. Anthony Blunt features here, and “Alex” is the code name of the real-life Russian double agent Oleg Penkovsky.

If the first world war spy games of the first volume inevitably recall John Buchan and Somerset Maugham, the two later volumes read a bit like a slightly less realistic version of John Le Carré. It has to be said that Gardner did not really leave his own distinctive stamp on the genre. He was though a highly professional and competent thriller writer, with a polished prose style, a fertile imagination and a knack of fitting his plots to real world events. This was what made him such an inspired choice to step into Ian Fleming’s footsteps.

He had a knack for coming up with good “alternative history” ideas. Here, the Kennedy assassination is cleverly connected to the American role in the fall of the Vietnamese government, prior to the war there. In the first volume, he offers a quite plausible explanation as to why people with all the advantages, such as the Railtons, might have become traitors.

And the Railtons do have all the advantages. They are a landed family of long standing. Their connection with the world of spying goes way back. “They’re mentioned in the bloody history books. One of them was a go-between for Anthony Standen, Walsingham’s agent. Sixteenth-century stuff.”  They all share a fondness for quoting from Shakespeare.

By this third volume, the Railtons have begun to be disillusioned with the secret world. “Why do we do it, Naldo asked himself now. . .then was shocked to realise he was repeating one of his father’s comments on the trade. ’God knows why we do it. The politicians treat us like dirt; the military have trouble in believing us; the general public think of us as superannuated adventurers, while the novelists make a killing from presenting us as candyfloss killers’.”

His colleague Gus Keane is much clearer about his motives. “Ok, why do we do it? Because we believe in freedom of thought, of speech and of movement. Here we can criticise the government in public; here we can read what we like and more or less print and say what we like. Try doing that in a totalitarian state – Communist or Fascist.”

But for Naldo: “Everything my family has ever done has been devious. . . This whole bloody country makes you like that, and when we all become a sort of United States of Europe, we’ll be more devious than ever.”

The book ends in 1989 with the revelation that an IRA plot to attack the handover of Hong Kong to the Chinese has been foiled, bringing the whole story full circle.

James Bond returns: Win, Lose or Die by John Gardner

James Bond goes back into the Royal Navy in Win, Lose or Die, the eighth in the series of  Bond continuation novels by John Gardner, published in 1989. Near the end of the cold war, a secret superpower summit is to take place aboard a navy ship in the Mediterranean. Bond must foil the terrorist group who plan to attack and disrupt it.

There’s plenty of action along the way. Bond engages in air-to-air combat, flying a sea harrier, and dodging a missile. There’s an assassination attempt at a villa near Naples, and a final confrontation with the head villain in the tunnels beneath the rock of Gibraltar. This is a fast-paced thriller written in Gardner’s fluent and elegant style,  and as usual with his take on Bond there is much to enjoy.

There are two women, one in the navy and one in the secret service, but which of them is not quite what she seems? Bond doesn’t find out until near the end. M’s elegant country house, Quarterdeck, makes a re-appearance and there’s a neat reference to Bond having been secretly involved in the Falklands war. The villain is motivated by greed, rather than the cause that his agents think they are fighting for.

I have a couple of minor quibbles, that I wish I could edit out. Bond is promoted to captain. Yes, I know captain is a higher rank, but commander just sounds so much better, doesn’t it. There is also another woman who is introduced merely to sleep with Bond before getting herself killed.

The Fleming estate chose well when they approached Gardner to revive Bond in 1981. He was already an established spy thriller writer. Before that he had served in the Royal Marines and the Fleet Air Arm. His brief was to bring Bond into the 1980s, so M and Bond remain about the age they were in Fleming’s books, but must deal with the geopolitical realities of the new era.

Perhaps the best of them, certainly of the ones I have read, is The Man From Barbarossa, published in 1991. In this book, Bond works with a Mossad officer to collaborate with the KGB, and the assignment takes him to Russia. A terrorist group is threatening the Russian government in an attempt to bring soviet war criminals of the second world war era to justice. But what is behind it? This is set at a very specific historic moment, just before the Gulf war, when the hardliners were trying to regain control of the soon to be extinct Soviet Union. All of this comes to an action climax when Bond goes up against the Spetznatz, or Russian Special forces.

It’s slightly untypical of the series as it’s more like a serious spy novel with a character called James Bond in it. It was reportedly Gardner’s favourite among his Bond novels. I read it in  a state of trepidation, because I was enjoying it so much I was worried that something would go wrong before the end, but I am pleased to say it did not. Certainly, it’s the only Bond continuation by any author that I did not find fault with and that I would put on the shelf next to Ian Fleming.

Other Bond authors have stuck to the original timeline, and this can create problems.

Colonel Sun by Kingsley Amis starts brilliantly, with the kidnapping of M, then continues well with a night time fight on the slopes of the acropolis in Athens. But as it goes on, the pace slackens; it’s like a balloon deflating.

Something similar happens with Solo, by William Boyd. It starts strongly, with Bond’s awaking from a dream of being back in the commandos. It was also a good idea to send Bond to Africa, something I believe Fleming was contemplating. Here, he is caught up in something like the Biafran war. But again, the novel slows down alarmingly in the second half, to the point of actually becoming quite boring when the scene shifts to America. There is also too much explaining of the villain.

Anthony Horovitz fell into a couple of traps with Trigger Mortis. He states very specifically that this story takes place just after Goldfinger, yet it is riddled with anachronisms. Again, there is far too much of an attempt to justify the villain psychologically. The modern political sensibility that, for me, mars Horovitz’s TV dramas, is also present. His second attempt, Forever and a Day is much better, but something of a missed opportunity, I feel. This is the Bond “origin story” and takes place before Casino Royale. But surely the Bond origin story that remains to be written is his time in the commandos in the second world war and his transition from that into the secret service? That is the story Boyd hinted at.

The spy novelist Anthony Price did something along those lines when he showed the main character of his espionage series, David Audley, as a young tank officer in Normandy who becomes involved in behind the lines operations in The ’44 Vintage.

Sebastian Faulks had a go with Devil May Care. A title worthy of Fleming, and there’s a neat joke at the beginning when Bond drives up the King’s Road and smells marijuana smoke. It’s a good read, but a bit of a Frankenstein’s monster, in that it seems to be assembled from left over parts of Fleming novels. For example, Goldfinger’s cheating at golf becomes cheating at tennis here, with a remote control adjustable net. One can’t quite escape the feeling that Faulks thought the task was beneath him. On the cover it said “Sebastian Faulks, writing as Ian Fleming”, in case anyone should mistake this for one of Faulks’ more serious productions.

It was Gardner, with his thriller writer’s imagination, who came closest to carrying on what Fleming had started. It was the more literary novelists who came a cropper. There’s a lively debate about his Bond novels on the internet, which suggests that they are still being read and enjoyed today.